This is the time of year that is high with excitement. It is special as no other season is. And it’s because our attention is once again drawn to the Great Story of a gift from God. The baby in the manger, his virgin mother, the angels announcing the good news of great joy for all people. We buy gifts for those we love as an echo of the greatest of all gifts. We echo the gift of the Savior God gave to us. And once again, we sing the carols that we have come to cherish over the years The songs remind us of what the celebration is all about: Joy to the world the Lord is come! Love came down at Christmas. (See also here.)
Just because this season is so special, it is also a time we lovingly anticipate being with family and friends. These, too, are a gift from God. What CS Lewis reminded us about concerning friends, applies even more so to family members:
A Quote from C.S. Lewis
“…for a Christian, there are, strictly speaking, no chances. A secret Master of the Ceremonies has been at work. Christ, who said to his disciples, “You have not chosen me but I have chosen you,” can truly say to every group of Christian friends, “You have not chosen one another but I have chosen you for one another.” The friendship is not a reward for our discrimination and good taste in finding one another out. It is the instrument by which God reveals to each the beauties of all the others. They are no greater than the beauties of a thousand other men; by Friendship God opens our eyes to them. They are, like all beauties, derived from Him through the Friendship itself, so that it is his instrument for creating as well as revealing. At this feast it is He who has spread the board and it is He who has chosen the guests. It is He, we may dare to hope, who sometimes does, and always should, preside. Let us not reckon without our Host.
This is the central truth behind the celebration. The love we share with others is not merely the consequence of God’s love for us. Rather, the love we give and receive IS the love of God shown to us through them and to them through us. This season, celebrate a gift from God.
Wishing you all a blessed Christmas,
https://www.canweknowgodisreal.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/son-of-god-born.jpg500354Roy Clouserhttps://www.canweknowgodisreal.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Loge-Idea-Crafting-300x120.pngRoy Clouser2019-12-22 02:25:122019-12-22 02:26:13A Gift From God
When we ponder the wonder of the Incarnation, we can find ourselves at a loss for words to express the wonder of that event. St Augustine wrote a profound selection in what we know today as Sermon 191. It was a message for his church, especially for those who had chosen to be nuns, on a Christmas Day. I offer it to you for your meditation and encouragement this Christmas season. See also a brief meditation on the Incarnation by Roy Clouser.
St Augustine on the Incarnation
“The Word of the Father, by Whom all time was created, was made flesh and was born in time for us. He, without whose divine permission no day completes its course, wished to have one day set aside for His human birth.
In the bosom of His Father, He existed before all the cycles of ages; born of an earthly mother, He entered upon the course of the years on this day.
The Maker of man became Man that He, Ruler of the stars, might be nourished at His mother’s breast;
that He, the Bread, might hunger;
that He, the Fountain, might thirst;
that He, the Light, might sleep;
that He, the Way, might be wearied by the journey;
that He, the Truth, might be accused by false witnesses;
that He, the Judge of the living and the dead, might be brought to trial by a mortal judge;
that He, Justice, might be condemned by the unjust;
that He, Discipline, might be scourged with whips;
that He, the Foundation, might be suspended upon a cross;
that Courage might be weakened;
that Healer might be wounded;
that Life might die.
To endure these and similar indignities for us, to free us, unworthy creatures, He who existed as the Son of God before all ages, without a beginning, deigned to become the Son of Man in these recent years. He did this although He who submitted to such great evils for our sake had done no evil and although we, who were the recipients of so much good at His hands, had done nothing to merit these benefits. Begotten by the Father, He was not made by the Father. He was made Man in the mother whom He Himself had made, so that He might exist here for a while, sprung from her who could never and nowhere have existed except through His power.”
https://www.canweknowgodisreal.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/250px-saint_augustine_portrait.jpg326240Bob Zomermaandhttps://www.canweknowgodisreal.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Loge-Idea-Crafting-300x120.pngBob Zomermaand2019-12-19 16:14:542019-12-19 16:14:54St Augustine on The Incarnation
https://www.canweknowgodisreal.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Life-After-Death-Feature.jpg8441066Henry Reyengahttps://www.canweknowgodisreal.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Loge-Idea-Crafting-300x120.pngHenry Reyenga2019-11-13 15:09:512019-11-13 15:16:25Do Near Death Experiences Confirm Faith about the After Life?
We hear a lot these days about the US becoming less religious, or, more specifically, has less religious affiliation. Nation-wide polls show that more and more people check off “None” when asked about religious affiliation. And that the percentage of those identifying as agnostic or atheist has risen from 16% to 23 %. What are dedicated Christians to make of such figures? Are we seeing a real downturn in religious commitment? If so, what is to be done about it?
The answer, I think, is:
“Yes,” there is a real downturn but, “No,” the figures aren’t accurate. Let’s
take the downturn first.
Following WWII, the US Government hit on a great idea to help slow the return of 10 million GIs into the work force. The idea was to give them a free college education as a benefit of having served their country. Many of those who started college under what was called “the GI Bill” never finished, but whether they finished or not having that opportunity forever changed their attitude toward college. Higher education, which had up to that time been available only to the wealthy, was now something the so-called “greatest generation” wanted for their children.
The result was that from
roughly the middle of the last century onward, a college education was added to
the expected post high school rites of passage for all but the poorest segment
of the population. Moreover, the number of high school grads applying to
college was given a significant boost in the 60s by the fact that going to
college could exempt men from being drafted to serve in Viet Nam. The result
was that by the early 70s, hundreds of thousands more high school graduates
were seeking college entrance than would ever have dreamed of it.
Is Educating People Making them “Unaffiliated?”
So, am I suggesting that
becoming more educated has resulted in the downturn in religious commitment?
I’m sure that’s what some would like to have us believe, but it’s not quite
true. It’s not simply being educated that has had the results we’re now seeing.
Rather it’s the way religion has been
taught at the college level across the nation for the generations since WWII.
Religion courses of all types have been among the most popular in the college curriculum for a long time nation-wide. Comparative Religion, for example, has been a huge draw on all campuses from community colleges to major research universities. Students are drawn to religion courses by curiosity and by what they see as the opportunity to study a fascinating subject. The students’ expectation was a course taught from an unbiased source and point of view, as opposed to the biased sources of their childhood religious upbringing.
The reputation of being
difficult that attaches to philosophy courses didn’t prevent philosophy of
religion from being well enrolled. Actually,
most Introduction to Philosophy courses have regularly included the
existence of God among the topics covered. It
is the prevailing way these courses were handled that I see as the cause of the
present-day decline in religious commitment and religious affiliation.
The Search for Unbiased Teaching
First off, the standard treatment of religious belief was not religiously neutral as opposed to the “biased” treatment of the average church, synagogue or mosque. College instructors have their beliefs and inclinations as do all other humans. And these include whether they believe in God or not. No one can expect anything different, but the average student entering college has been unprepared for that fact. Many even supposed the existence of a neutral stance from which to debate the question of God’s reality. There isn’t.
Second, the standard treatment of whether God is real was (and still is) to examine the arguments that have attempted to prove (or disprove) God’s existence. And there are, and always have been, a minority of professors who defend one or another proof. But, the vast majority left the upshot of their examination stamped “UNDECIDED.” This conclusion conveyed two great mistakes to the last four or five successive generations of American students. Without explicitly stating or examining these mistakes the following was simply accepted. 1) the way to ascertain God’s reality is by argument and proof. And 2) the attempts at proving God’s reality have all failed. The conclusion these generations reached is that no one really knows the truth about whether God exists or not. Many choose to have no religious affiliation.
The Proofs Have Failed
Let’s take the second one
first. I agree that the proofs have all failed. But I disagree that their
failure leaves God’s existence in doubt. There’s a simple but important point
that all attempts to prove God’s reality have overlooked: the New Testament
says that God created “everything visible or invisible (Col. 1: 16). If that’s
right, it includes the laws of logic, one of the invisible creations. But if God created
the laws by which we prove anything, then he is not subject to them. Applying
them to God is therefore demoting him to the status of a creature. The proofs
argue that God is governed by laws of proof instead of being their Creator.
The proofs have also done
other mischief against their best intentions. They have led many people to
think that belief in God is a theory,
and therefore in need of proof. When we make theories we do, indeed, try to
test them. And logical proofs are frequently part of that process. But belief
in God is no theory! It is instead a report of the experience of those who have
Experience it for Yourself
College students today need
to be told to look for their own experience of God, rather than to engage in
the logical evaluation of arguments. They need to be urged to read the
scriptures in order to hear God speak to them. They need their own encounter
with the living Creator who is not the conclusion of an argument. Instead, he is
the God and Father of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Jesus Christ.
In our consideration of the place of ethics and our
understanding of ethics, I have been playing around with some considerations
from history. I would like to turn now
to see how the Word of God addresses ethical issues. I’m going to call these
next several blog entries my moral musings. (just to have some alliteration!)
In one of my earlier ponderings on ethics, I stated that, for me, a central text for my own understanding of what is ethical and moral arises from the prophet Micah’s declaration (in chapter 6:8),
He has told you, O man, what is good;
does the Lord require of you
but to do justice,
and to love kindness,
to walk humbly with your God?
Chinese Exclusion Act 1882
I pondered this precept from God for many years already. I came to the realization that many who might quote this as their moral center, have failed to put it into practice. Too many of us have come to the point, along with much of Western culture, that if you are not caught and punished for some deed, it must be “OK.” The result? The laws of one’s land are the arbiter of what is good, moral, and just.
Here is one example that occurred in my country, the USA. In 1882, the Congress of the United States passed a law. It was called the Chinese Exclusion Act. The law suspended all immigration into the United States from China. It was only supposed to be in effect for 10 years, but actually remained in effect for 61 years. It was changed in 1943 when China allied itself with the United States in World War II.
Was that ethical?
Now was the law moral, or ethical, or just? Many in that day thought the law was just. Why? Because, anyone with Asian features aroused deep suspicion among the rest of the population. Chinese people “flooded” into California following the 1849 Gold Rush. The populace already in California said the Chinese were “causing social disruption” to their communities. By 1943, much of the anti-Chinese sentiment had faded. And immigration began again with 105 (yes you read that correctly) Chinese allowed to immigrate every year.
Again, I have to wonder, why did those in authority believe that someone of Asian origin was suspect? How did they manage to listen to sermons on Micah 6? Did they not ask themselves if the laws of the nation in which they lived reflected God’s will for the nation as much as for an individual? Where does the pursuit of what is right: to do justice, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with God stop and the law of a country begin?
Is Morality only Personal?
Let’s ask ourselves, Do the laws of God extend to only me as a single person or are God’s laws also intended for the good of a whole society? As we muse on morality further in posts to come, let’s try to see how and if God’s will extends to counties as well as people. I hope you will join the discussion.
https://www.canweknowgodisreal.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/moral-compass-app_thumb7-1.jpg217584Bob Zomermaandhttps://www.canweknowgodisreal.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Loge-Idea-Crafting-300x120.pngBob Zomermaand2019-06-11 00:00:032019-06-11 00:00:04My Moral Ethical Musings
Here are some interesting links for you! Enjoy your stay :)